text from "the secret world of drawings"s to a picture we do not so e

"We can never accompany another person beyond where we have traveled ourselves. I am not saying the only a horse can judge a horse show, but it certainly helps to know something about horses before going about judging them.

Looking at a picture with no preconceived ideas may be difficult, yet we must try to take the picture at face value and see how it fits into its creator's life. When we come with this openness to a picture, we do not so easily project our own psychology onto others.

This projection is the greatest danger of all: that is, to come to a picture with preconceived ideas, to believe that another person's psychological is the same as our own.

An open mind is vital to the productive interpretation of drawing and helping a patient follow his own path, not the path that we think he should take.

There are three premises we must accept in order to understand language of drawings.

The first is that there is an unconscious, and that picture come from the same level as dreams."

As it says on the text, the "projection," is actually what I want to accomplish with my work. However, what is stated here is that the 'projection' is dangerous because the work was created during art therapy where everything is prioritised for the patient. In my case, the actual 'patient' is not the drawer or creator but the viewer, which means that I should not project my own thoughts by thinking/guessing how the viewer would think by looking at my work. I need to prioritise the viewer more in this project, and by that means, I shouldn't create too descriptive work that narrows down viewers perspectives, and give a space for the viewer to come in to the painting.

 

Gianfranco Baruchello

creating graph and figuration used with arrows and words in order to express what is in the artist mind is an interesting approach in painting. 

Gianfranco-Baruchello-Piccola-mostra-itinerante-antipotere-1975-Il-Ponte-Firenze.jpggianfranco_baruchello_2_72dpi_1.jpg

53.jpg

 

Gianfranco Baruchello is a contemporary Italian artist known for his experimentation with a variety of media. Baruchello’s primary focus has led to a lifelong investigation of the human mind through drawings and paintings of symbols, systems, and words. “Every new work I make functions as a tool, a device to understand and test if my language is still working,” he has explained. Born in 1924 in Livorno, Italy, Baruchello studied law and later helped run his father’s business. A self-taught artist, his earliest works consisted of paintings based on the small details of his daily life. After moving to Paris in the early 1960s, he had a fateful meeting with Marcel Duchamp, who would become a lifelong friend. Baruchello later traveled to New York, where he met John Cage, and took part in the group exhibition “New Realists” at the Sidney Janis Gallery. After inheriting an abandoned villa outside of Rome in the early 1970s, the artist established a farm where he grows crops and raises cattle and sheep. The 94 year old currently divides his time between Rome, Italy and Paris, France. Today, Baruchello’s works are held in the collections of The Museum of Modern Art in New York, the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago, and the Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris, among others.

NEO RAUCH

 

2017_NYR_14997_0834_000(neo_rauch_moder).jpg

cri_000000320134.jpg

rauch-marina.jpg

Neo Rauch's (b. 1960) paintings are characterized by their distinctive combination of figurative imagery and surrealist abstraction. His enigmatic compositions employ an eccentric iconography of human characters, animals, and hybrid forms within familiar-looking but imaginary settings. While Rauch begins each work without a preconceived idea of the finished result, there is a uniquely recognizable, visual coherence to his oeuvre. Paintings often display palettes of strong, complementary colors, and recurrent subjects include the seamless integration of organic and non-organic elements as well as references to the creative process, music, and manual labor. The artist's treatment of scale is deliberately arbitrary and non-perspectival, and often seems to allude to different time zones or planes of existence.

Rauch was born in 1960 in Leipzig, where he continues to live and work, and studied at the Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst. Since 2000, Rauch's work has been represented by David Zwirner. His 2019 solo exhibition Propaganda, on view at the gallery’s Hong Kong location, marks the artist’s eighth gallery presentation and his first solo presentation in China. Previous solo exhibitions at the gallery in New York include At the Well (2014), Heilstätten (2011), Neo Rauch (2008), Renegaten (2005), Neo Rauch (2002), and Neo Rauch (2000), which marked his United States debut.

https://www.davidzwirner.com/artists/neo-rauch/biography

 

ROSE WYLIE

 

 

 

Really like how the actual painted elements are simple, yet powerful and I found some similarities in art therapy drawings and her work. 

She's also using her materials and the base of the painting very well in order to create the 'depth' in her painting which I also want to take in. Her base looks like something she found, not something she created which also actually gives impression with the viewer to focus more on the element of the drawing, as well as the base/background not distracting too much.

She keeps the elements in her painting very close to the viewer of finding out the meaning, but still cannot understand what is actually going on. I like that relationship with the artist and the viewer, because it makes the viewers look into themselves rather than getting meaning from the painting.

Whitechapel,+Blue+Clouds,+2017,+Oil,+Pencil,+Pen+and+Collage+on+Paper,+84+x+60+cm+Rose+Wylie_LR.jpg_dsc4578_0.jpg

Savarin+Trifle+(Film+Notes)+2010+Watercolour+and+Collage+on+Paper+84+x+59+cm+Rose+Wylie+-+Edit_LR.jpgwylie1.jpg

Rose Wylie finds inspiration for her visually compelling paintings through her daily encounters and a variety of sources, from art history, cinema, comic books and the natural world to news, verbal anecdotes, celebrity stories and sport. These might include a scene from Quentin Tarantino’s iconic Kill Bill films, a self-portrait of Wylie eating a chocolate biscuit, or a football match. Her vibrant, large-scale canvases filled the walls of the Serpentine Sackler Gallery.

Quack Quack included paintings dating from the late 1990s to the present day – some never previously exhibited, including a new group of works inspired by Hyde Park and Kensington Gardens. One, based on Wylie’s childhood memories of living in Bayswater during the Blitz, maps the park’s landscape – dogs, ducks, the Serpentine lake, and both the historic building and Zaha Hadid’s present day extension of the Gallery – with memories of Spitfires and Messerschmitt planes fighting overhead. The exhibition title connected similarly to place as well as to ‘ack-ack’, a term used to describe Second World War anti-aircraft artillery.

Wylie often paints through the filter of memory and impression, using text to enhance facts and recollections and editing images by overlaying new pieces of canvas over images, like a collage. At times, the compositions of her paintings are informed by cinematic techniques, whether the multiple headshots of Sitting on a Bench with Border (Film Notes) 2008, based on Pedro Almodóvar’s 2006 film Volver, or Wylie’s two paintings from the 2005 film Syriana, which take in a panoramic and close-up shot of the same scene.

Instilled with wit, Wylie’s paintings are confident, animated and energetic, proposing new perspectives on the world and the plethora of images that make up our collective cultural memory.

https://www.serpentinegalleries.org/exhibitions-events/rose-wylie-quack-quack

 

ATLAS OF FACIAL EXPRESSION

 looking at face expression, thinking what elements create the viewer to sense an emotion. 

Untitled_13022019_183920_006.jpg.1

Untitled_13022019_183920_001.jpg

Untitled_13022019_183920.jpg

 

Untitled_13022019_183920_004.jpg

Untitled_13022019_183920_005.jpg

 

http://blood-pressure.imedpub.com/assessing-self-using-art-therapy-a-case-analysis.php?aid=7654

 This website explains the detailed feature of art therapy drawing, and so very helpful in order to examine the drawings I've done. 

FACIAL EXPRESSIONS

"Guillaume Benjamin Amand Duchenne de Boulogne"

https://wellcomecollection.org/works?query=%22Guillaume%20Benjamin%20Amand%20Duchenne%20de%20Boulogne%22

 using actual human picture, looking at expressions and the use of the facial features in emotions.

default.jpgdefault.jpg.1

default.jpg.2

IMAGES OF ART THERAPY

IMAGES OF ART THERAPY2 .jpg

IMAGES OF ART THERAPY 1.jpg

1.jpg.22

I personally find these drawing made during art therapy really interesting to look at as these are drawings drawn without thinking about the viewer and audience presence which is something I find it hard to do recently. 

It is also interesting to look at how theses were made without the artist having a theme or anything in their mind. They just drew this from their natural expressions. Which means these drawings are so raw and true to the feelings, and I find that approach in art creation is really important when working with the 'transportation of emotion' project. 

 

PRINZHORN

02021668f270496a85be6b130863c8d4.jpg

"Search for Meaning and Crisis" features works by Sonja Gerstner and Marcia Blaessle, who painted their dreams and nightmares until they took their own lives. From December 17 until April 10, Dubuffet’s List will depict Dubuffet’s view on the Collection, based on his visit in September 1950.

0b1fff383e2b4910b00ebbd43dc0e401.jpg

aperfectcommotion: Emma Hauck, letter written to her husband while she was in a psychiatric hospitalfrom the Prinzhorn Collection (arsvitaest)

e693ec49b29cf18ca585c2f0c8f075de.jpg

'Around 1910, James Edward Deeds, a patient in a mental asylum in Nevada, Missouri (State Lunatic Asylum No. 3) created 283 drawings on the letterhead of the institution. He calls himself the "electric pencil"

I really have interest in this drawing, not knowing exactly why but it still catches my eye which can be caused by the power of that rawness and stillness. Everything in this drawing looks so still, but there is something beyond that makes me feel like there is more to it. I also like the selection of what is drawn. Tiger, person and the frame. Everything looks very symbolic and each elements are strong. 

 

Marlene Dumas

dumasbell.jpg

Marlene-Dumas-The-White-Disease.jpg

92a9780d-a6fa-4156-a365-e412d75daa63-1741x2040.jpeg

Her paintings expresses raw and strong emotions. She does that by using the elements of oil paint effectively. She leaves out some blank space for the viewers emotion to go within, and think about the inner self. Although she works by using photographs, the person painted looks like they live within the painting and looks very much alive. That 'aliveness' and 'rawness' can be used to transport emotions.

 

Cy Twombly's work

CY TWOMBLY 2.jpg

CY TWOMBLY.jpg

One thing I like about Cy Twombly's work is the speediness. By looking at his work, I can sense the presence of the artist, which ables for the viewers to sense the emotions and the actual body motion but in unconscious level. 

The lines look very alive and strong, it seems like there was no barrier between the artist and the work, which also ables for the viewer to have no barriers between his work. 

I think the strangeness of his work is how the work looks and exists like its 'ours' not only for artists. 

 

Helena's Dream, 2008 Oil on canvas 51 2/5 × 43 3/10 in 130.5 × 110 cm

THE SECRET WORLD OF DRAWINGS

the secret world of drawings.jpgThis drawing itself really attracts me. I like how the sheep shape is drawn with blue and the other elements is drawn by bright colours. The drawing looks very iconic and it sticks in my head for quite a long time. The drawing itself is really simple, but it still gives me emotions of somehow powerfulness and aggression which I found it interesting. 

PRINZHORN

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 12.17.07.png

Before his committal at the age of twenty-four Horacek was a gardener. Diagnosed as schizophrenic, he refused all communication. Sometimes he responded to a question but never “to the point”, turning his head away. From 1979 drawing became his only means of communication. His oval faces are divided horizontally and transversely. Each box seems to function as an autonomous cell that appears to have its own life, a drawing in itself, but also as a part of a whole.

 cabeaf9a81e5bea943814ffb69e79ca1.jpg
Emma Hauck’s letters to her husband from the mental asylum. ‘Sweetheart come’ written over and over again. Held in the Prinzhorn Collection in Heidelberg.
f28552b275e8e3f481333ac624e2f660.jpg
Emma Hauck’s letters to her husband from the mental asylum. ‘Sweetheart come’ written over and over again. Held in the Prinzhorn Collection in Heidelberg.

Mark Rothko

From the book 

The Artist's Reality ; Philosophies of Art 

"Art is not only a form of action, it is a form of social action. For art is a type of communication, and when it enters the environment it produces its effects just as any other form of action does."

 

 

 

yayoi kusama

https://hirshhorn.si.edu/kusama/yayoi-kusama/#eternal-soul

 

MY HEART'S ABODE, 2016
Acrylic on canvas
194 x 194 x 7 cm

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 11.56.27.png

My Eternal Soul

Begun in 2009, My Eternal Soul currently comprises over five hundred works. Kusama has said that through this series, she hopes to trace the “beauty of colors and space in the silence of death’s footsteps and the ‘nothingness’ it promises.” Within these paintings, which embody both the radiance of life and the sublimity of death, motifs from Kusama’s earliest works are often echoed, giving evidence to the singular vision that has driven her over the course of her long career. The effects of color vibration and exuberant patterning, for instance, are reminiscent of Kusama’s works on paper from the 1950s and 1960s. And, like her Infinity Mirror Rooms, which are simultaneously enclosed and expansive, colors and patterns pulsate within the bordered spaces of these canvases. The pattern of peering eyes is consistent with her tendency toward obsessive, endlesslly proliferating images, and the voyeuristic pattern transforms flat color fields into shadowy depths. Other biomorphic forms, some resembling microorganisms, populate Kusama’s strange landscapes, and titles such as Aggregation of Spiritssuggest that these paintings may be surrogates for human souls.

 

Infinity Nets Yellow, 1960

Oil paint on canvas 

240 x 294.6 cm

39-KUSAMA_38-1024x831.jpg

 

Infinity Nets

Kusama created her Infinity Net paintings during her first years in New York, a time when she faced tremendous financial and emotional hardship. The repetitious motion of inscribing tiny arcs on a solid black background served as a meditation through which she made works “without composition—without beginning, end, or center.” Though stemming from a very personal experience, Kusama’s “interminable nets,” later called Infinity Nets, were remarkably prescient to the formal questions of art in the 1960s. Embodying the painterly qualities and the emphasis on process that are characteristic of Abstract Expressionism, these works also echo the restraint and monochromatic palettes of Minimalism.

I really like the strong expression her painting has. It feels like the expression comes straight to the audience, which is also my intention of my project.

When I always check her video of painting, I came to realise how all the elements are actually drawn one by one from herself. 

The canvas are very big comparing to what she is drawing one by one, and i think that making the viewer feel the action of her drawing is also important in order to create catharsis.

 

 

Madness and art in the Prinzhorn collection. 2001. The Lancet, 358(9296), pp. 1913.

Madness and art in the Prinzhorn collection. 2001. The Lancet, 358(9296), pp. 1913..jpg

ABOUT SRCIBBLES

CY TWOMBLY

SCRIBBLES.jpg

SCRIBBLES 2.jpg

ABOUT WORDS

CY TWOMBLY

Thinking about using words as a powerful element in painting, I tried to search hint on what kind of word I should add and the intention behind it. 

 

WORDS .jpg

Cy Twombly - words 1.jpg

ABOUT TITLE

CY TWOMBLY

TITLEs.jpg

TITLE 2.jpg

Cy Twombly - words 3.jpg

Rothko

https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-mark-rothko-artist

 

Famed     believed that art was a powerful form of communication.
“The fact that a lot of people break down and cry when confronted with my pictures shows that I can communicate those basic human emotions,” he said in an interview in 1956.
“The people who weep before my pictures are having the same religious experience I had when I painted them.”
Through canvases of floating forms and glowing, suspended rectangles, Rothko sought to create a profound connection between artist, canvas, and viewer.
What’s more, he asserted that his works not only expressed human emotion, but also stimulated psychological and emotional experiences in those who witnessed them.
“Painting is not about an experience,” he told LIFE magazine in 1959. “It is an experience.”
While Rothko believed his paintings spoke for themselves—and routinely derided art critics who attempted to explain his practice with words—that didn’t stop him from developing his own theories about the power of art and the creative process.
Throughout his career, from the late 1920s until his death in 1970, the New York–based painter amassed a body of writing and gave a number of interviews that reveal his views on how creativity can be unlocked and encouraged. Below, we highlight several of Rothko’s words of wisdom.
 'Powerful form of communication' is also my similar thoughts on painting/art. 
 

Follow your childlike instincts

Untitled
 I really like the color combination of this painting. Personally I find purple and orange is an unmatched color, but in this painting the red and yellow is being used wisely in order to create connection with orange and purple. Usually I make sure not to add too much information at the bottom part of my painting because it will look heavy. However, this painting also makes me watch the orange part as well, and that complementary is really working well, which I also want to use for my work. The orange part that makes me stare for a while gives me space to think more bout the painting. This painting is mysterious which is why it catches my eye. I think I will try to use that complementary and mysteriousness to my work.
 
 
In one of Rothko’s earliest essays, “New Training for Future Artists and Art Lovers” (1934), the artist emphasized the creative benefits of approaching art like a child might—instinctively, without the guidelines of overbearing instruction.
By watching children work, he wrote, “you will see them put forms, figures, and views into pictorial arrangements, employing of necessity most of the rules of optical perspective and geometry, but without the knowledge that they are employing them.”
This may be why, he wrote, “their paintings are so fresh, so vivid and varied.” He added that an artist of any skill level should seek to “make his work arresting and provoking of attention.”
What’s more, Rothko advised artists to naturally express emotions and experiences, like children do, in order to develop their own unique style. “As a result of this method,” he wrote, “each child works on his own idea, and actually develops a style of his own whereby his work is distinguishable from everyone else’s.”
Rothko would develop these innovative pedagogical theories throughout his adult life, focusing on art instruction that supports each individual artist’s instincts, rather than limiting their creative impulses by pushing general principles.
In one manuscript, which he wrote around 1941 while serving as art supervisor at the Center Academy of the Brooklyn Jewish Center, he called for “avoidance of physical and emotional inhibitions” in teaching.
He applied these ideas to his own practice, too. Rothko dug deep into his own subconscious in order to free himself from what he saw as the restrictive nature of representation. Eventually, this process fueled the abstract paintings that would define his groundbreaking practice and pioneer  .
 

Express the inexpressible

Rothko came of age at a time when painters itched to break completely from the confines of representation. Building on forays into abstraction pioneered by their modernist predecessors, like  , Rothko and his fellow Abstract Expressionists wanted to remove all allusions to the physical world in their work. Instead, their paintings would embody metaphysical forces and interior worlds. As art critic David Cotner put it, Rothko “used colors, shades and gestures as moving evocations of mythology itself.”
Indeed, Rothko emphasized that “the most interesting painting is one that expresses more of what one thinks than of what one sees.” Likewise, he placed great weight on abstraction’s ability to convey what is most important to humans—not the world around them, but their emotional life. “[Shapes] have no direct association with any particular visible experience, but in them, one recognizes the principle and passion of organisms,” he wrote, in the art journal Possibilities.
While Rothko was a master colorist, as evidenced by his signature monochromatic rectangles, whose deep reds and blacks reverberated against each other, he routinely emphasized that his paintings weren’t simply about a selective palette.
“If you are only moved by color relationships, you are missing the point,” he once told writer Selden Rodman. “I am interested in expressing the big emotions—tragedy, ecstasy, doom, and so on.
He believed that these emotions, when conveyed through abstraction, would stoke intimate, profound emotional experiences in the viewer, as well.
“One does not paint for design students or historians but for human beings,” Rothko stressed to curator William C. Seitz, “and the reaction in human terms is the only thing that is really satisfactory to the artist.”
 

Eliminate barriers between audience and canvas

To achieve this deep and direct response from viewers, Rothko took care to remove what he saw as
“obstacles between the painter and the idea, and between the idea and the observer,”
as he said in a statement published in the art journal Tiger’s Eye in 1949. He wanted to forge clear pathways through which his audience could fully experience his paintings, which became, as scholar Miguel Lopez-Remiro has pointed out, “scene[s] of communication with the viewer.”
He achieved this through increasingly abstract compositions, lacking identifiable markers of the outside world. He also left his paintings untitled, allowing viewers to respond to the forms that filled them, rather than written clues. Rothko gravitated towards large canvases without frames, too, so that the work became one with the audience’s environment—as interactive as a door or window might be. “Small pictures since the Renaissance are like novels,” he once said in a lecture at Pratt Institute. “Large pictures are like dramas in which one participates in a direct way.”
The painter also advised that viewers situate themselves as close as 18 inches away from his canvases, “perhaps to dominate the viewer’s field of vision and thus create a feeling of contemplation and transcendence,” as the Museum of Modern Art has suggested.
 

Remove ego from your art

Rothko also identified the artist’s ego as a major roadblock in facilitating a meaningful connection between artwork and audience. He believed that ego, or allusions to the artist’s biography and role in society, only distracted from art’s true power to elicit
pure human reactions.
While Rothko embedded his own emotions into his abstractions, he believed these were universal elements of the human experience, not unique to his situation. “I don’t express myself in my paintings,” he once whispered to critic Harold Rosenberg, while waxing on Abstract Expressionism at a party. “I express my not-self.”
The most poignant example of Rothko’s intent to remove ego from art is his theoretical manuscript “The Artist’s Reality,” which was published by his family in 2004, long after the artist’s 1970 suicide (Rothko suffered from depression throughout his adult life). While the text presents many of Rothko’s most developed theories on art and creativity, he very rarely uses the word “I,” and doesn’t mention his own paintings or practice. Indeed, his transcendent abstractions, too, are absent of any “I.” Instead, they express emotions that are universally understood and experienced by humans.  
 
Alexxa Gotthardt is a contributing writer for Artsy.

e thickness

https://galerie-karsten-greve.com/en/exhibition/Cy-Twombly/Paper-October-12-2013-February-8-2014/en

CT P20 (Venus+Adonis) 1978 (SF-RA) (150 dpi).jpgstatic1.squarespace.jpg

I really like how the paint is placed thick but on the canvas/painting it does not look heavy and stays to create the role of what it wants to express.

I like how there is a line between the scribbles and also drawing as a painting. I want to create this space of audience thinking in my work as well.

Might use big wood to paint on, I like the boldness of this painting.

haruna kawai

 

I personally like her use of shapes, colours and the structure in her painting. 

She uses the shapes effectively in creating the atmosphere and the point where those shapes meet each other is strong and sharp which I want to also use for my paintings to create some sort of tense atmosphere and sharpness. 

HarunaKawai-Illustration-ItsNiceThat-3.jpg

HarunaKawai-Illustration-ItsNiceThat-4.jpg

HarunaKawai-Illustration-ItsNiceThat-2.jpg

Mark Rothko

From 

The Rothko Book

"Rothko told Seitz that he wanted 'our response in terms of human need. Does the painting satisfy some human need?' In his view, the emotional element with which he felt he had imbued his work appealed to the imagination of the general observer more than formal analysis."

 

about colour composition; 

"I'm interested only in expressing basic human emotions, tragedy, ecstasy, doom."

 

presentation

"His belief was that the positioning of his works, rather than a text, could aid viewers in their response. He added that this initial powerful impact may well give the key to the observer of the ideal relation ship between himself and the rest of the pictures.

abstract

"he stated that he thought of hid pictured as dreamers while the shapes in the pictures are performers and organisms with coalition and a passion for self assertion."

 Mark Rothko’s paintings and Cy Twombly’s paintings, I’ve come to realise that the reason why these two painters works are successful in terms of creating therapeutic change is because what they actually create are not forms of the viewers emotional state/unconsciousness, but projections of our inner selves.